> Last week they gave Boeing the choice of entering a guilty plea and paying a fine as part of its sentence or facing a trial on the felony criminal charge of conspiracy to defraud the US over the crashes, which claimed 346 lives.
Why not both? We have them over a barrel and the best we can do is ask them to invest a measly sum as penance and then drop the defraud charges? What is this.
Is it possible that a criminal conviction would be harder/take much longer to accomplish and this will ensure some kind of positive outcome? Or is it just a slap on the wrist? I don't really know.
[dupe]
More discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40902749
> Last week they gave Boeing the choice of entering a guilty plea and paying a fine as part of its sentence or facing a trial on the felony criminal charge of conspiracy to defraud the US over the crashes, which claimed 346 lives.
Why not both? We have them over a barrel and the best we can do is ask them to invest a measly sum as penance and then drop the defraud charges? What is this.
Is it possible that a criminal conviction would be harder/take much longer to accomplish and this will ensure some kind of positive outcome? Or is it just a slap on the wrist? I don't really know.
Because you cannot punish someone while also trying them?
[flagged]